header-logo header-logo

The injury damages divide

11 February 2016
Issue: 7686 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The discrepancy between legal remedies for physical injury and those for injury to feelings is unacceptable, according to a senior personal injury solicitor.

Writing in NLJ this week, Diane Parker, head of personal injury at Atherton Godfrey says: “There is a large discrepancy that already exists between the levels of damages awarded for ‘bodily injury’ and those awarded for ‘name calling’.”

This reflects a class divide, Parker says, since defamation claimants are typically rich celebrities, politicians or sports stars. A labourer, on the other hand, may not have such a highly valued public reputation to defend but a physical injury could ruin their livelihood.

The government’s proposed ban on whiplash claims will only increase this divide, says Parker. “In the interests of saving motorists £50 a year on their insurance policies, thousands of injured people will be denied the derisory levels of compensation they could expect to be awarded and will lose any realistic prospect of recovering the earnings they lose while physically unable to work.”

Issue: 7686 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll