header-logo header-logo

Information meltdown

24 May 2007
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features , Local government , Property
printer mail-detail

HIPs will be hindered by the failure to reform the local authority search market, says Mark Riddick

Local government holds the information required by conveyancers to undertake their due diligence requirements on the purchase of a property by their clients. It competes with private companies in the compilation of searches for conveyancers from that information. It is claimed that certain local authorities compete unfairly by restricting the private search companies’ access to the information.

LOCAL AUTHORITY SEARCH FEES

Local authorities can justifiably claim that they do not have the resources (funding or personnel) to cope with providing the necessary facilities to private search companies. This is because central government has set a fee for access to this information at a level that is not currently calculated to recover all of the cost of maintaining and providing the information.
The fact that the fee charged to private search companies for access is £11, and the cost of a search compiled by a local authority (the so-called “official search”) can be as much as £300, suggests that either the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll