header-logo header-logo

22 May 2024
Issue: 8072 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-detail

Infected blood compensation raises questions

Sir Brian Langstaff, chair of the Infected Blood Inquiry, which published its 2,500-page final report this week, has called for a statutory duty of candour to be imposed on civil servants and healthcare leaders

Responding to the report, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak apologised for government failures. John Glen, the paymaster general, later set out details of a multi-billion-pound scheme to compensate victims and families by the end of the year, in a statement to the House of Commons.

Glen said payments of £210,000 would be made within 90 days and, where an infected person has died, compensation will be paid to their estate. He said Sir Robert Francis, whose government-commissioned report with recommendations for compensation was published in 2022, would be appointed interim chair of an infected blood compensation authority.

Des Collins, senior partner of Collins Solicitors, who has represented about 1,500 victims of the scandal, said Glen’s update was ‘a positive step and broadly encouraging. While the additional interim payment for those infected is, of course, welcomed, many of our bereaved families, who have to date received nothing, are extremely disappointed that there is no information as to how the recently promised interim payment of £100,000 to be paid to estates may be claimed.

‘We also continue to have concerns and will be carefully reviewing the detail to come around delivery mechanisms. Other government compensation schemes, notably for Post Office and Windrush victims, have been flawed in execution, due to overly complicated, bureaucratic administrative requirements and a lack of appropriate support.’

More than 30,000 people were infected with HIV, Hepatitis C, or both, through contaminated blood transfusions from the 1970s to 1990s, with more than 3,000 deaths.

Issue: 8072 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll