header-logo header-logo

17 January 2019 / Dr Karen Brennan , Dr Emma Milne
Issue: 7824 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Infanticide: guarding against harshness

Dr Karen Brennan & Dr Emma Milne examine the socio-historical context behind the infanticide law

 
  • For the offence/defence of infanticide to apply, the mental disturbance suffered by the accused does not need to be solely due to the consequence of giving birth. Providing birth was an operating or substantial cause, there may also be other contributing factors, such as pre-existing mental health conditions.
  • Infanticide operates as a mechanism for lenience in instances where a woman kills her infant while experiencing a disturbance of the balance of the mind.
  • Cases of newborn child killing involve vulnerable women. This has been recognised historically in the disposal of women who kill newborn children and the Infanticide Act is still needed today to facilitate leniency in such cases.

In July 2018, the Court of Appeal ruled that a woman could rely on the Infanticide Act 1938 even in situations where the disturbance of the balance of her mind was not caused ‘solely’ by reason of the effect of childbirth (R v Tunstill

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll