header-logo header-logo

22 March 2023
Issue: 8018 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , International , Legal services , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

India beckons as practice restrictions lifted

Lawyers have welcomed the Bar Council of India’s historic decision to allow foreign lawyers and law firms to practise law in India, on a restricted and reciprocal basis.

Foreign lawyers and law firms can register to practise in non-litigious matters only but will be able to work on foreign law, international legal issues and international arbitration cases.

The Bar Council of India (BCI) said, in a statement, the move ‘would be mutually beneficial for lawyers from India and abroad’.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja said the decision was ‘a significant step forward in this long-standing issue and will create huge opportunities for solicitors and Indian advocates in both countries. 

‘We look forward to engaging further on the implementation of the regulations, based on reciprocity of access, and on further initiatives to foster collaboration, cooperation and joint practice between Indian advocates and solicitors.’

Mythily Katsaris, partner and India Desk lead at UK law firm Fladgate, said: ‘The new rules do not address the point on exclusive tie-ups between foreign firms and Indian firms, with each practising their respective laws.

‘I would hope that the Bar Council of India clarifies this point soon. The Bar Council of India has permitted foreign lawyers to practise foreign law in India in non-litigious matters only, subject to compliance with BCI’s Rules and registration requirements. However, appearing in Indian courts, and advising on real estate matters in India, has been specifically excluded.

‘However, foreign lawyers who do not want to practise law in India under the new rules can continue to advise on a “fly in and fly out basis”, provided their practice does not exceed 60 days in any period of 12 months. Overseas investors investing in India will have the comfort of working with their overseas lawyers if they are on the ground, in India.’

Rupa Lakha, partner at Charles Russell Speechlys, said: ‘This is a hugely exciting development and means a definite path forward for foreign lawyers looking for opportunity in India.

‘Having just completed a visit, I know there is great opportunity for UK lawyers to collaborate with Indian Counsel and this latest news has just brought us all one step closer to achieving great things. It also has broader significance in terms of moving forward the UK/India trade partnership. Much more to follow, I am sure.’  

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll