header-logo header-logo

Independent Living Fund closure challenge fails

10 December 2014
Issue: 7634 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Two severely disabled men who use the Independent Living Fund (ILF) have lost their bid to overturn the government’s decision to close the ILF in June 2015, after the High Court ruled former minister for disabled people Mike Penning had not breached equality laws. The claimants argued Penning did not have sufficient information to assess the practical effect of closure on ILF users. However, Mrs Justice Andrews ruled that Penning was made fully aware of “the inevitable and considerable adverse effect” of closure, in R (oao Aspinall) v Work and Pensions Secretary [2014] EWHC 4134 (Admin). 

 

Issue: 7634 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll