header-logo header-logo

Income Tax (Pay As You Earn) (Amendment) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/822)

20 March 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Amend the Income Tax (Pay As You Earn) Regulations, SI 2003/2682, to introduce the Real Time Information programme and close the Simplified PAYE Deduction Scheme to new employees from 6 April 2012.

Commencement date

6 April 2012


Legislation Affected
SI 2003/2682 amended

Summary

Allow the phasing in of Real Time Information for different employers between commencement and October 2013.

Grant HMRC power to require security or further security for sums owed under the PAYE system. Detail the circumstances that give rise to the power and the procedural requirements. Specify the time limits to pay within before an employer will have committed an offence under Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003, s 684.

Ensure where employment related securities are paid by a former employer after the end of an employment and which were not included on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll