header-logo header-logo

24 March 2021
Issue: 7926 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Impact of COVID on legal profession

Despite significant difficulties in some parts of the legal profession, the sector as a whole remained broadly stable during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to Legal Services Board (LSB) data

The numbers of lawyers registered to practise remained much the same, scotching fears practitioners might leave the profession.

However, the LSB acknowledged these figures mask the disproportionate impact on legal aid firms, where more than 70 offices have closed since April 2020, and on people at the start of their career, those with caring responsibilities, sole practitioners and small firms.

LSB chair Helen Philips said: “For the first time, we can see the emerging data on the impact on the profession in terms of turnover and numbers of regulated firms and lawyers. Turnover in the legal services sector remained flat in 2020, while turnover across all UK services fell. Overall numbers of regulated law firms and legal professionals in England and Wales remained stable.

“The overall figures mask that the crisis has affected parts of the profession differently. As our Covid-19 dashboard shows, there have been substantial changes in consumer demand across different parts of the sector, with some areas dropping off significantly and others booming. The LSB’s focus continues to be on supporting recovery, growth and competition that supports the public interest.

“We are very concerned about the impact of Covid-19 on the diversity of the profession. As the sector recovers, we must continue creating and supporting a sector that looks like the society it serves.

“Everyone who needs legal advice must be able to access it, and we are committed to working with everyone inside and outside the profession to reshape legal services to better meet the needs of society.”

Issue: 7926 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll