header-logo header-logo

22 September 2017
Issue: 6672 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Data protection
printer mail-detail

The impact of GDPR (Pt 1)

nlj_7762_carousel_morrison

Organisations that have had a ‘lackadaisical attitude’ so far to the data protection overhaul scheduled to take effect next May ‘have a lot of work to do’, lawyers have warned.

Once the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) comes into force, non-compliant organisations that commit a serious breach risk fines of up to 4% of their annual worldwide turnover for the preceding financial year or €20m (whichever is greater). The current ceiling on data protection violations is £500,000.

The GDPR will impose significant obligations on organisations that process personal data, and creates numerous challenges. These range from an obligation to demonstrate consent and the new right to be forgotten to the requirement on all public bodies to appoint a data protection officer.   

In the first of a four-part series in NLJ on the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Rollits specialists David White, senior solicitor, and Tom Morrison, partner, explore why the current data protection legislation needed updating and provide an overview of some of the key changes being introduced.

Issue: 6672 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Data protection
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll