header-logo header-logo

15 April 2020
Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Immigration backlog ahead

Employers could face ‘costly delays’ to immigration applications for employees next year when the points-based system begins, lawyers have warned

The Home Office published guidance last week on the new system, due to take effect from 1 January 2021. It advises employers to apply sooner rather than later for a sponsor licence if they want to hire skilled overseas nationals.

Philip Barth, head of immigration at Irwin Mitchell said: ‘If the government has warned businesses to apply now, then they anticipate there will be a backlog of applications that is created by the end of this year, potentially resulting in costly delays for both the business and the applicant involved in the process.

‘If only a tiny percentage of those SMEs who are employers are going to need a sponsor licence, that means many thousands of employers will need to apply. Will the Home Office have the capacity to deal with this influx?

‘We are accordingly advising our business clients to apply sooner rather than later when there will inevitably be a last-minute rush.’

Those looking to work in the UK from abroad will need to meet a variety of requirements, including a minimum salary threshold and a job offer at the required skill level, adding up to a total of 70 points. Businesses recruiting overseas nationals into skilled roles next year will need a sponsor licence, if the employee doesn’t have existing rights such as settled status or indefinite leave to remain.

Barth said: ‘The government is forging ahead with its new immigration system, despite the spotlight being on the key workers in the coronavirus pandemic who would be classed as “low skilled” by next year and who would not meet the skills or salary threshold for the skilled worker route.’

Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll