header-logo header-logo

02 March 2010 / Doron Blum , Matthew Davies
Issue: 7262 / Categories: Features , Immigration & asylum , Employment
printer mail-detail

Immigration and asylum update

Bulgarian and Romanian Workers, Application of Chen in self-sufficiency cases, Highly skilled migrant programme, Migration advisory committee

ACCESSION AND AFTER

The Accession (Immigration and Worker Authorisation) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/3317) came into force on 1 January 2007, and with them the populations of Bulgaria and Romania acquired free movement rights and effective exemption from immigration control. Important derogations from Art 39 of the EC Treaty imposed, for the accession period, a condition of worker authorisation on non‑exempt Bulgarian and Romanian nationals intending to enter the UK labour force. So we arrive at the uncomfortable distinction between A8 nationals admitted in 2004 and A2 nationals. The Home Secretary’s statement on 24 October 2006 cited emerging pressures on housing, education, English language training and the labour market itself as justification for these transitional arrangements and promised annual review.

In practice, they work as follows:

Employment

The authorisation process defaults to the work permit arrangements, so employers must still apply for work permit permission to employ Bulgarian or Romanian nationals under one of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll