header-logo header-logo

Immigration

30 November 2012
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of BB) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission and another [2012] EWCA Civ 1499, [2012] All ER (D) 210 (Nov)

Neither the detention of an individual pending his deportation, nor the grant of conditional bail pending deportation, involved a determination of civil rights within the meaning of Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The expulsion of an alien and his detention pending expulsion did not determine his civil rights. At most, they incidentally had an effect on those rights. The distinction was critical in the context of a state’s control over aliens who were within its territory. The fact that the exercise of the power to deport would have an effect on an individual’s right to respect for private and family life or other rights did not mean that the exercise of the power involved a determination of the individual’s civil rights. So too, the fact that the detention of an individual pending deportation would affect him in that way did not mean that the detention involved a determination of civil rights.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll