header-logo header-logo

Illegality defence

01 April 2010 / Caroline Lody , David Hertzell
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

The complexities of the illegality defence could soon be history. David Hertzell & Caroline Lody explain why

The Law Commission published a final report and draft Bill to reform the illegality defence in trusts law last month. The reforms aim to make the law clearer and less arbitrary. The draft Trusts (Concealment of Interests) Bill applies where a trust has been created to conceal the ownership of property for a criminal purpose, such as where someone “parks” property in someone else’s name to defraud creditors. The Bill provides that in most cases, a claimant beneficiary would be able to rely on their normal right to enforce the trust. However, in exceptional circumstances the courts would have a discretion to give the property to the trustee.

The problem

Calls for law reform arose out of the House of Lords’ decision in Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340. Here a couple bought a house together but registered it in Ms Tinsley’s name only, so that Ms Milligan could unlawfully claim social security

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll