header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

I spy with my private eye

Extramarital affairs are up, prompting a huge rise in the use of private investigators by divorcing couples to confirm fears that their other half was cheating on them, family lawyers report.

The numbers using snoops to catch out their unfaithful spouses shot up to 49% of all divorcing couples in 2006, compared to just 18% in 2005, according to Grant Thornton Forensic and Investigation Services practice’s fourth annual survey of 100 of the UK’s leading family lawyers.

The survey showed that women were nearly twice as likely to use such a service to check up on their spouse than men—unsurprisingly, perhaps, given that in two thirds (69%) of cases it was men who played away.

According to the lawyers surveyed, the stated reason for marital breakdowns in the UK in 32% of cases was due to one partner having an affair during 2006, up from 29% in 2005 and 27% in 2004.

Behaviour was blamed for marriage breakdown in 17% of cases, followed by family strains in 8% of cases and decisions of a personal nature in 4% of instances.

Only 4% cited emotional and physical abuse as the reason for their divorce, down from 12% in 2005.
Andrea McLaren, head of Grant Thornton’s London matrimonial practice says one of the survey’s most surprising results was the fall in the number of couples who tried to hide assets from their estranged spouse. In 2006, only 10% of couples did so, down from 16% in 2005.

She says that given the House of Lords’ judgment in the Miller and McFarlane cases, this figure was expected to increase as spouses tried to keep assets out of the pot of wealth which the courts can carve up.
McLaren says that possible reasons for the decline could include the sophisticated forensic techniques now available to search for such “hidden” assets.

However, she adds that it could simply be due to the fact that women today have a stronger awareness of and involvement in their financial affairs than in the past.

Issue: 7270 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll