header-logo header-logo

15 September 2016
Issue: 7714 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Hyperlinking copyrighted work lawful if not for profit

Owners of commercial websites face uncertainty following a landmark European Court of Justice (ECJ) decision on hyperlinking, which lawyers fear could have a “chilling effect”.

In GS Media (Case C-160/15), the ECJ ruled that hyperlinking to a copyrighted work published online without the owner’s consent is lawful as long as it is not for financial gain. The case arose after Sanoma, the Dutch publisher of Playboy magazine, commissioned a photoshoot with Britt Dekker, a reality TV star, and the photos were leaked to an Australian file sharing site. GS Media posted a hyperlink to a page on the Australian site where they could be downloaded. GS then refused Sanoma’s request to remove the hyperlink, and copyright infringement proceedings were brought.

The ECJ held that hyperlinking did not amount to a “communication to the public” of that work, as long as the person posting had no knowledge that the work was published illegally. However, there will be a rebuttable presumption that the person posting the link did have knowledge of its illegality where they posted the hyperlink for financial gain, as they would be presumed to have carried out the “necessary checks”.

Mark Owen, partner at Taylor Wessing, warned of a potential “chilling effect”. He said the rebuttable presumption was likely to be problematic. “On a basic level, national courts may struggle to import a knowledge test into cases relating to primary copyright infringement, since the question of intent (or negligence) is not usually relevant at the stage of considering whether there was an act of infringement in the first place”. Establishing “financial gain” raised practical difficulties where, for example, a personal website or blog carried some paid advertising but on a small-scale. It was also difficult to know what the ECJ meant by “necessary checks”. Tom Collins, associate at Stevens & Bolton, said: “For those sharing hyperlinks in a commercial context, there will now be an expectation to carry out checks to ensure that the content has not been illegally published. This will inevitably raise some practical difficulties for some online businesses.”

Issue: 7714 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll