header-logo header-logo

The human touch

nlj_7707_walker

Constructive dismissal upholds the law of contract, but with a human touch, says Tom Walker

  • The contractual nature of constructive dismissal.

Constructive dismissal is all about contract law. It serves as a tonic to us employment lawyers. We are so used to our questions of fairness, reasonable investigation and legitimate aims that now and then it is good for us to adjust our minds to the pure law of contract. For example, it is all too easy to assume that a constructive dismissal is an unfair dismissal and confuse the two concepts. Perhaps the best reminder of the difference is the case of Farrant v Woodroffe School (1997) EAT/1117/96, [1998] IRLR 176.

A technician at a school was asked to teach another subject where there was under-staffing. He refused. The headteacher, mistakenly believing that he had a contractual right to impose the change, consulted with the technician and then implemented the decision. Mr Farrant resigned. There was a constructive dismissal in that there was no contractual right to make such a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll