header-logo header-logo

Human rights

24 May 2012
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 91 (May)

The Strasbourg jurisprudence recognised the importance of freedom of expression in the political sphere and that the limits of acceptable criticism were wider in the case of politicians acting in their public capacity than they were in the case of private individuals. That recognition involved both a higher level of protection for statements in the political sphere and the expectation that if the subjects of such statements were politicians acting in their public capacity, they laid themselves open to close scrutiny of their words and deeds and were expected to possess a thicker skin and greater tolerance than ordinary members of the public.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll