header-logo header-logo

A human right to smoke?

19 June 2008 / Neil Allen
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Has the government struck the right balance between the freedom of smokers and the welfare of non-smokers? Neil Allen reports

Our freedom to choose when and where to smoke is now regulated by the Health Act 2006 and its accompanying regulations which, broadly speaking, ban smoking in enclosed public places and work premises. Smoking in one's own home is not forbidden. Other types of accommodation, such as prisons, care homes and hospices, are similarly exempted from the prohibition. Hospitals are not, so patients must brave the weather if they wish to smoke. However, that is not an option for many patients detained under the Mental Health Act 1983.

The government originally intended to exempt designated smoking rooms in mental health units providing long-term residential accommodation. However, the public's response to its consultation opposed such a move. As a result, and unlike the position in Ireland and Scotland, reg 10(3) of the Smoke-free (Exemptions and Vehicles) Regulations 2007 merely provides a 12-month “sunset clause” to the ban. From 1 July

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll