header-logo header-logo

How ‘public’ are public inquiries?

14 May 2021 / Helen Stone, Hickman & Rose , Eleanor Cornish
Issue: 7932 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Covid-19 , Inquests
printer mail-detail
48968
Accessibility & accountability in inquiries must remain paramount despite the demands of COVID measures, argue Helen Stone & Eleanor Cornish

Public inquiries are a crucial element of the UK’s democratic system. By establishing the facts about a scandal or large-scale tragedy, they enable a wide range of institutions and individuals to be held publicly accountable. Wrongdoing is exposed, lessons are learnt, and the public’s confidence is rebuilt as the institutions (hopefully) evolve.

While they can take different forms, the most rigorous and independent inquiries are those held under the Inquiries Act 2005 (IA 2005). The importance of public access to such inquiries (and the information disclosed to them) is enshrined in IA 2005, s 18, with the default position being that individuals can attend—and see and hear—a simultaneous transmission of proceedings, unless a restriction notice or order is imposed.

IA 2005, s 19 empowers the inquiry chair to impose these restrictions. However, any such restriction must be only those required by, for example, statutory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll