header-logo header-logo

16 July 2018
Issue: 7802 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

How to make it as a corporate counsel

Report highlights key factors for in-house success

In-house counsel who want to earn a lot of money should work elsewhere first, move into an industry such as life sciences, and be a man.

That’s according to the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC), which published its 2018 Global Compensation Report this week, a study of salary and benefits information from more than 5,000 in-house counsel and legal professionals in 65 countries.

It found a 22% gender pay gap for general counsel where men earn a median of $270,000 (£203,340) in total compared with $210,000 (£158,163) for women with similar experience and in a comparable role. However, the gap shrinks for those who received their degree more recently—for example, the gap is $85,000 (£64,010) for those who graduated law school before 2000 but $35,000 (£26,359) for those who graduated after 2015.

‘While it was not a surprise, it was certainly disheartening to see the extent of gender pay disparities in the in-house community,’ said Veta T. Richardson, president and CEO of ACC.

‘Yet we are optimistic that the gap appears to shrink for newer generations of corporate counsel leaders and hope the data in the survey will yield more transparency.’

The research showed that it pays to gain experience outside of a corporate legal department first—even two years in a law firm or government department equates to higher compensation.

In terms of sector, in-house counsel can expect to make more money if they work in biotechnology/life sciences, technical/research development or accommodation/food services.

It can also pay to work in a public company—median base salaries for all in-house legal positions are nearly $25,000 (£18,828) higher in public companies than in private ones, and there is a $48,000 (£36,154) difference when comparing total compensation.

Overall, however, salaries are expected to go up. Some 78% of in-house counsel expect a rise next year and more than a quarter of general counsel expect an increase of at least 5%.

More than three-quarters of respondents received a performance-related bonus in 2017, and the median amount was $33,000 (£24,856). Nearly half have 25 or more days paid holidays and 43% have flexible work schedules.

The three highest paying practice areas are capital markets/securities/finance, mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust/trade regulations.

Issue: 7802 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll