header-logo header-logo

26 March 2009 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

How certain is death?

Seamus Burns welcomes an attempt to prevent the wrongful diagnosis of death

Benjamin Franklin famously said there were only two certainties in life, namely death and taxation.

The recent publication by the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, A Code of Practice for the Diagnosis and Confirmation of Death, represents the medical profession's latest attempt to nail down and clarify when it is appropriate to diagnose and confirm when someone is dead.

The code is designed to remove ambiguities in the way death was diagnosed in the earlier 1998 code and to take cognisance of the technological innovations in medical practice in the last decade. Arguably, too it seeks to address the horror stories (anecdotal in some cases) of patients diagnosed as dead by doctors, allegedly coming back from the dead. Indeed the BBC, under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 revealed last year that patients in five English hospitals had been incorrectly diagnosed as being dead over the past five years.

Dr Jan Bondeson, Professor of Rheumatology at Cardiff University, is concerned that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll