header-logo header-logo

16 April 2010
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

In-house weave their magic

In-house counsel have gained prestige within their companies as a result of recession-led changes to the legal sector, while Magic Circle firms have lost status

In-house counsel have gained prestige within their companies as a result of recession-led changes to the legal sector, while Magic Circle firms have lost status.

The long-established practice of hourly billing is giving way to value billing, with firms offering freebies such as free-of-charge secondees to keep value-conscious clients on board.

A report, Law firm of the 21st century—The clients’ revolution, commissioned by international law firm Eversheds, warns law firms that that they need to modernise or lose out as a major power shift is taking place in favour of the in-house client.

The report canvassed the opinions of 130 general counsel and 80 law firm partners around the world, with just over half (51%) of clients and 46% of partners citing the term, “Magic Circle”, as defunct.

The overwhelming majority of clients and partners said they welcomed the change to the traditional law firm hierarchy.

In-house counsel have gained status—three-quarters of general counsel said they occupied a more senior commercial advisory role in their companies than before the recession.

The recession has also affected the way law firms charge. The hourly rate is now seen as just one tool among many billing structures, and 63% of clients reported seeing better value for money since the recession through add-ons such as free-of-charge secondees. For the full story see www.newlawjournal.co.uk.
 

Issue: 7413 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll