header-logo header-logo

13 November 2013
Issue: 7584 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

In-house feels the freeze

Figures show many in-house lawyers suffered pay freezes

Pay freezes affected nearly one quarter of in-house lawyers in the last year, with senior in-house counsel most likely to suffer.

Figures from Incomes Data Services (IDS) show 30% of heads of legal had their salaries frozen, up from 13% in 2012, while pay freezes doubled overall on the previous year.

Nevertheless, the average salary for heads of legal rose 2.3% to £138,000, with one company paying its head lawyer nearly £500,000.

Conversely, the average pay increases for all in-house lawyers falling from 2.7% last year to 2.4% this year.

On average, in-house solicitors earn £47,261, legal advisers earn £56,695, senior legal advisers earn £76,171, and deputy general counsel earn £95,450.

Nasreen Rahman, assistant editor at IDS, says a number of organisations are currently recruiting to their in-house teams and have had no “major headache” finding suitably qualified lawyers.

Bonuses for heads of legal were as high as 120% of basic salary, but averaged £26,825. The average bonus for solicitors was £3,318.

Issue: 7584 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll