header-logo header-logo

26 September 2013
Issue: 7577 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

“Horror stories” of lawyers

Call for complaints against lawyers from non-clients to be accepted

The Legal Services Consumer Panel has stepped up its campaign for the legal services ombudsman to accept complaints about lawyers from people other than clients, by publishing a series of real-life “horror stories”.

The 37 case studies include sorry tales of house purchases falling through, harassment over alleged debts, violations of privacy and abusive treatment in the court room.

One woman said she was “intimidated and frightened” by her ex-husband’s solicitor’s colleague, who spoke aggressively to her in the private room where she was sitting because there was a history of domestic violence. 

Third parties made 2,184 complaints to the ombudsman in 2012-2013.

The panel, which acts as an independent adviser to the Legal Services Board, first called for the ombudsman’s remit to be widened last June.

Elisabeth Davies, chair of the panel, says: “The panel accepts that not all third-party complaints should be investigated, but the current blanket ban on all such complaints is plainly wrong.”

Chief Legal Ombudsman Adam Sampson said his office would be working on proposals for dealing with the issue over the coming months.

Issue: 7577 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll