header-logo header-logo

11 March 2022 / Dr Ping-fat Sze
Issue: 7970 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , International
printer mail-detail

Hong Kong: small claims, big problem?

74290
Lay litigants left behind: are small claims proceedings in Hong Kong fit for purpose? Dr Ping-fat Sze investigates
  • The Small Claims Tribunal of Hong Kong deals with over 42,000 contractual and tortious claims a year, the vast majority of which are resolved before proceeding to trial.
  • The tribunal is a popular forum for resourceful parties pursuing claims against individuals without any legal assistance.
  • It is argued that the tribunal is now ill-equipped to handle consumer disputes classified as small claims, given the complicated matters of law and fact involved.

In Hong Kong, the Small Claims Tribunal has virtually exclusive jurisdiction over most contractual and tortious claims not exceeding HK$75,000 (about £7,200). Pursuant to the Small Claims Tribunal Ordinance, proceedings in the tribunal are informal, the rules of evidence do not apply, and legal representation is excluded. The tribunal is also empowered to determine its own practice and procedure.

There are over 42,000 claims lodged with the tribunal each year, compared to approximately 10,000 civil actions filed with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll