header-logo header-logo

12 August 2022
Issue: 7991 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Home Office drops police registration scheme for migrants

The police registration scheme, which required certain visa holders to register with the police, has been suspended with immediate effect

The Home Office announced the decision with no prior notice on 4 August. Those with existing appointments, where they would have attended the police station in person to have their documents checked, will no longer need to attend.

A note from the Home Office to be circulated to constabularies said: ‘We are abolishing the requirement to register with the police as the police registration scheme in its current form is outdated and no longer provides any public protection benefit to either the Home Office or the police.

‘The data a migrant provides to the police on registration is already captured by the Home Office at the visa application stage, and is available to the police on request via Immigration Enforcement, so there is no need for it to be provided twice.’

The note advised that ‘migrants who have been issued with a visa with the requirement to register on it do not need to go to a police station to register’, and those who have previously registered with the police do not need to do anything.

Joanna Hunt, head of immigration at Fieldfisher, said: ‘The fact that the government has finally decided to drop the requirement for certain visa holders to register their status and address with the police is great news and a step in the right direction for making the UK a more welcoming place.

‘The Home Office keep their own records on migrants in the UK so the records that the police held were largely redundant. What they did serve to do was alienate and discriminate against those nationalities who had to register, thus tainting them with the appearance of criminality.

‘Registering with the police therefore played a role in creating a hostile and unwelcoming environment for foreign migrants and it is for this reason it's (quiet!) suspension is good news indeed.’
Issue: 7991 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll