header-logo header-logo

Holiday pay: broadening the horizons?

25 March 2022 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7972 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
75714
Charles Pigott reports on a Court of Appeal ruling widening the scope for back-dated holiday pay claims
  • As a result of the latest ruling in the Pimlico Plumbers holiday pay dispute, back-dated claims from miscategorised workers will be considerably easier to bring.
  • The decision also has implications for workers with historic claims for underpaid holiday.

Gary Smith’s claim for accrued holiday pay was finally upheld by the Court of Appeal in February 2022 (Smith v Pimlico Plumbers Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 70, [2022] All ER (D) 11 (Feb)). The claim, valued at over £74,000, equates to four weeks’ holiday entitlement for each year of his engagement as a worker between August 2005 and May 2011.

Background

Mr Smith instituted proceedings in the employment tribunal in 2011, following the termination of his engagement with Pimlico Plumbers. He brought several claims, including for unpaid holiday entitlement, arguing that he was an employee, or alternatively a worker, and not a self-employed contractor as Pimlico Plumbers maintained.

At a preliminary hearing in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll