header-logo header-logo

Hold the line

30 March 2007 / Michael Tennant
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Michael Tennant outlines the potential benefits of using telephone hearings

Interlocutory hearings by telephone were regarded as a novelty when the civil justice reforms were introduced on 26 April 1999. They represented the first cautious step in the exploitation of technology in the context of civil court procedure.

Following the initial pilot operating in Newcastle upon Tyne—with the county courts at Bedford and Luton joining in later—the scheme was extended last year. Now, thanks to the 44th update of the Civil Procedure Rules, the scheme will join us permanently and nationally as from 6 April  2007.
Where the intent, a phone line and a conference receiver have coincided, telephone hearings have proved popular and saved considerable costs, particularly if the parties’ legal representatives are located some distance from the court.

Reviews and requests

It is a presumption that all allocation and listing hearings and interim applications, case management conferences and pre-trial reviews with a time estimate of less than an hour will be dealt with by telephone via a court service approved telecommunications provider. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll