header-logo header-logo

Hillsborough: unlawful killing

27 April 2016
Issue: 7696 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Longest inquest in British legal history concludes 27 years after tragedy

The 96 Liverpool football fans crushed to death during the April 1989 Hillsborough disaster were unlawfully killed, the jury at the two-year inquest has concluded.

The jury were tasked with 14 questions about the FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest, which ended in tragedy. They found that the fans were unlawfully killed; David Duckenfield, the former chief superintendent in charge of policing the match, was guilty of gross negligence; there were “major omissions” in the operational order of the game; there were errors by the ambulance service; and Liverpool fans were not to blame.

The jury reached a majority verdict about unlawful killing and were unanimous on the police pre-game planning, stadium safety and the emergency services’ response. They criticised the “slow and uncoordinated” police response and ruled that officers should have closed a tunnel leading to the overcrowded area before ordering an exit gate to be opened.

Criminal investigations into allegations of a police cover-up to shift blame on to the fans are ongoing. The initial inquests ruled that the deaths were accidental, but these were quashed following the 2012 Hillsborough Independent Panel report after families battled for decades to have the truth exposed.

The Crown Prosecution Service is considering whether to bring further criminal charges.

In a joint statement, Elkan Abrahamson, partner at QS Jackson Canter, and Marcia Willis-Stewart, partner at Birnberg Peirce & Partners, representing the Hillsborough Justice Campaign and the Hillsborough Family Support Group, said the jury’s conclusions “completely vindicate the family’s long fight for justice”.

“It is therefore all the more shameful that, rather than focusing on the search for truth and despite having made public apologies, the approach to the inquests taken by South Yorkshire police and the Yorkshire ambulance service was to fight tooth and nail to avoid adverse findings by the jury; this turned the Inquests into an adversarial battle that probably doubled the length of time it might otherwise have done,” they said.

“There is, however, still a long road to travel; the recent investigations have already taken 3 years and we therefore now urge the authorities to conduct rigorous and speedy investigations which will lead to criminal and disciplinary proceedings and to the attribution of final and full accountability.”

They said the families had shown “a constant and enduring tenacity and dedication to exposing the truth which has, despite all attempts to derail the process, stood firm over the decades”.

 

Issue: 7696 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll