header-logo header-logo

23 October 2014
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

High Court: Pirate websites can be blocked

The High Court has jurisdiction to stop internet service providers (ISP) allowing access to websites that breach trade mark rights by selling counterfeit goods, it has held, in the first case of its type.

The case, Cartier International and Others vs BSkyB and others [2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch), concerned the trade mark rights of Richemont, owner of luxury brands such as Cartier and Mont Blanc. Richemont selected sites that wholly infringed its trade marks and sought an injunction against an ISP to block access.

The question arose of whether the High Court had jurisdiction to grant an injunction—the court held that it did.

Jeremy Blum, partner at Bristows, says: “This decision is a real development for brand owners in fighting online counterfeiting.

“Since L’Oreal v eBay and the recent s 97A copyright cases it was generally viewed that trade mark owners ought to be able to obtain an injunction against an ISP intermediary to block access to websites that infringe trade mark rights, and this is the first decision confirming the UK courts have jurisdiction to grant such an injunction as well as setting out the principles to be applied in determining if an injunction should be made.

“Broadly whether an injunction against an intermediary should be made, the court must assess whether the injunction is proportionate, effective, dissuasive and not a barrier to legitimate trade. The interesting point in future will be the range of websites that will be able to be blocked; for example this case involved websites wholly engaged in infringing activity.”

Issue: 7627 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll