header-logo header-logo

05 June 2018
Issue: 7796 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Helping the digitally excluded

Legal rights group JUSTICE has set out ‘practical and achievable’ recommendations to help those left behind as the justice system embraces digital technology.

Those who are unfamiliar with technology, or lack the skills or resources required to access it, could be ‘digitally excluded’ from the justice system, according to the JUSTICE report Preventing digital exclusion from online justice, published this week. High-risk groups include detainees and the homeless. Others may face difficulties because they live in areas with low broadband speeds, making it difficult to download forms, or are simply uninterested in going online. Some older people do not have helpers who they can trust.

A JUSTICE working party has been looking at the issue of the digitally excluded since last autumn, following Lord Justice Briggs’ Civil Courts Structure Review, which estimated that 70% of the UK population may need support to engage in proceedings online.

Currently, the Ministry of Justice is forging ahead with plans to introduce an online court for low-value civil claims and intends to automate and digitise all civil money claims by 2020, with an interactive triage system for litigants in person. Tribunals and criminal proceedings will also make greater use of online procedures and virtual hearings.

JUSTICE make 19 recommendations, mainly directed at HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS), which already runs a project to provide support through telephone, web chat or face-to-face advice, Assisted Digital.

It calls on HMCTS to conduct more research into how people access online services, and to invest further in digital skills training and support in venues such as community organisations and libraries. Other recommendations include ensuring online justice services can be accessed on mobile technology and designing services with accessibility and simplicity in mind.

Amanda Finlay CBE, chair of the working party, said: ‘Preventing digital exclusion from online justice will require a continuing programme of learning from users' needs and experience to improve assisted digital support and the online court itself.

‘Inclusive, user friendly design and creative thinking will make online justice better for all users. Our recommendations are deliberately practical and achievable and we hope they will be implemented.’

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Roger Smith, NLJ columnist & former director of JUSTICE, notes ‘there are signs that the senior judiciary, having initially backed the modernisation programme, are beginning to be a bit more sceptical’.

Issue: 7796 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll