header-logo header-logo

09 October 2015 / Jeffrey T Shapiro
Issue: 7671 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Help is out there

nlj_7671_t-shapiro

Jeffrey T Shapiro examines what support is available to assist litigators to satisfy the increased focus on early settlement & costs control

The new Practice Direction on pre-action conduct and protocols (PDPACP) came into force on 6 April 2015. Pre-action behaviour now directly supports the overriding objective to enable “the court to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost” (CPR 1.1(1)). Under the PDPACP, “the court expects the parties to have exchanged sufficient information before commencing proceedings: (1) to understand each other’s position and make decisions on how to proceed; (2) to try to settle without proceedings or consider Alternative Dispute Resolution; and, (3) where proceedings are necessary, to enable efficient management at a proportionate and reduced cost” (PDPACP 3).

While the objectives of the PDPACP and CPR now align, the data-driven realities of our modern world are at odds with the need to get to the facts quickly at reduced cost. With the Jackson Reforms, the government instituted a menu of disclosure options when formal proceedings commence to help reduce

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll