header-logo header-logo

Helmet breaks copyright frontier

03 August 2011
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The force was with the manufacturer of the original Star Wars stormtrooper helmets in a Supreme Court hearing on copyright last week

The justices unanimously held that the helmets are not works of sculpture and therefore not protected by UK copyright law, in Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39.

They also held—in a “major” change of policy—that foreign copyright infringement claims can be brought in the English courts.

The defendant made the helmets for the first Star Wars film in 1976. In 2004, he began to produce and sell replicas. In 2006, Lucasfilm obtained judgment in default through the US courts.

In order to bring their case in England, Lucasfilm argued that the design was an artistic work and covered by copyright law. If it was a functional design then copyright protection would not apply.
Martyn Fish, partner at HGF Law, said: “It means any foreign company can try to enforce copyright in the UK courts, which is a major change.

“A lot of IP lawyers will be surprised by this judgment. It’s good news for us though as it may mean more work. It’s one more way of enforcing the law and may provide clients with a stronger remedy. I would be amazed if forum shopping didn’t take place.”

Danielle Amor, associate at Hogan Lovells, said: “Before now, you needed to litigate the infringements separately in each jurisdiction where your rights had been infringed.

“Claimants may now be able to bring actions in the UK against UK resident defendants for infringement of their rights in multiple jurisdictions.”

Issue: 7477 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll