header-logo header-logo

04 February 2016
Issue: 7685 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Health & safety fine levels soar for UK plc

New sentencing guidelines represent “sea change” in health & safety law

Health and safety fines are soaring, with four UK companies incurring fines of more than £1m in the space of six days in January.

Fines of £4.8m were imposed between 21 and 26 January 2016. Meanwhile, tough new sentencing guidelines for health and safety and corporate manslaughter took effect on 1 February. Under the guidelines, large UK companies face unlimited fines with a starting point of £7.5m on organisations with a turnover of more than £50m, for corporate manslaughter. Smaller organisations with a turnover of up to £2m could face a fine of £450,000 or more.

Last month, C.RO Ports London Ltd was fined £1.8m following an incident where an employee caught his arm in a rotating machine. National Grid Gas plc was fined £1m after an engineer became trapped between two gas pipes. Balfour Beatty was fined £1m after a fatal crane incident. UK Power Networks (Operations) Ltd was fined £1m following the death of a runner who was electrocuted by a low-hanging high voltage power cable.

Gerard Forlin QC, of Cornerstone Barristers, who told NLJ in November that the new guidelines would “send a chill through corporate UK”, says: “Many parties may well have been trying to get cases to court before the guillotine date of 1 February 2016 heralding the new guidelines. The above listed fines appear to be a barometer or precursor of what is to come.

“Fine levels (and terms of imprisonment) are set to explode, and will inevitably lead to more trials. For those cases where guilty pleas will be entered, complicated preliminary hearings dealing with culpability bandings and turnover utilising experts will become the norm. Only time will tell, but how easily will courts be able to manage these additional, potentially lengthy hearings in already clogged up calendars? These guidelines represent a real challenge to everyone concerned.”

Danny McShee, partner at Kennedys, says: “The new sentencing guidelines represent a sea change in health and safety law. We anticipate that as the courts become familiar with the guidelines over the coming months, we will be increasingly advising corporate clients that they face a level of fine which, until very recently, would have been almost unfathomable.”

Issue: 7685 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll