header-logo header-logo

Having the final say

23 May 2014 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7607 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
web_mason_0

Henrietta Mason & Paola Fudakowska provide a wills & probate update

In Brooke v Purton (Huntley) [2014] EWHC 547 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 262 (Mar) Mr Huntley wished to leave his estate between his partner, and five children in equal shares. As his estate was substantial (mainly comprising a 90% shareholding in an unquoted company), he was concerned about the children’s ability to manage a large inheritance. In order to meet Huntley’s aims and concerns, his adviser, a 2-years’ qualified private client solicitor, suggested including Huntley’s business assets (which would benefit from business and agricultural property relief) in a discretionary trust which could be managed by the trustees.

 

In drafting the will, the solicitor included a clause establishing a nil rate band discretionary trust which she had adopted wholesale from the firm’s precedent library. However, she overlooked the fact that, whereas a nil rate band discretionary trust was usually used in conjunction with gifting to an exempt beneficiary, in this case there was no spouse and a number of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll