Motor finance commissions: has the dust settled?

14 March 2025 / Eddie Flanagan , Harpreet Sandhu

Issue: 8108 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Consumer , Financial services litigation

With shockwaves from the motor finance commissions case continuing to reverberate, Eddie Flanagan & Harpreet Sandhu explain why it is time for the financial services sector to reflect on compliance & customer trust

The Johnson v FirstRand Bank case ruling on undisclosed motor finance commissions has led to industry shockwaves, and massive compensation provisions, raising concerns over rising regulatory costs.
The judgment highlights the need for transparency in the form of clear disclosure, stronger consumer protections, and practical, balanced regulations.
The wider implications of this case include heightened scrutiny, which challenges financial institutions to adapt while balancing compliance costs and innovation.

In November 2024, Santander UK announced that it had set aside £295m to potentially compensate motor finance customers following the landmark Court of Appeal judgment in the combined cases of Johnson v FirstRand Bank, Wrench v FirstRand Bank and Hopcraft v Close Brothers Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 1282 (‘Johnson’). This provision significantly impacted Santander’s quarterly profits, which fell to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Motor finance commissions: has the dust settled?

The Johnson v FirstRand Bank case ruling on undisclosed motor finance commissions has led to industry shockwaves, and massive compensation provisions, raising concerns over rising regulatory costs.
The judgment highlights the need for transparency in the form of clear disclosure, stronger consumer protections, and practical, balanced regulations.
The wider implications of this case include heightened scrutiny, which challenges financial institutions to adapt while balancing compliance costs and innovation.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Motor commissions & fiduciary duties

The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings

NLJ this week: The power of Interpol red notices

Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Approach with caution post-Mazur

Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?

Philip Sales is selected as next Deputy President

Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year

Tax shock ahead for partners?

Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget

Error message

Motor finance commissions: has the dust settled?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington