header-logo header-logo

15 December 2011 / Alex Odell , Victoria Oakes
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Handle with care

Justice v security: has the government got the balance right? Victoria Oakes & Alex Odell review the evidence

The government’s Justice and Security green paper, which Ken Clarke introduced to the House of Commons in October, was said to be the culmination of a year’s careful consideration of “how to respond to a difficult scenario in any liberal democracy”, namely, how the courts can be best equipped to pass judgments in cases involving sensitive material.

There is cross-party support for the principles behind the paper, for which the deadline for responses is 6 January 2012. In the past decade, there has been an increase in the number of cases in which the security and intelligence agencies are involved. Unfortunately, the courts have been ill equipped to deal with this change. In drafting the green paper the government hopes to restore the nation’s faith in the ability of the agencies to keep Britain safe, while maintaining sufficient regard for the rule of law. The judiciary must be enabled to reach just conclusions in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll