header-logo header-logo

Habeas corpus & challenging care orders

14 March 2025 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 8108 / Categories: Features , Family , Child law
printer mail-detail
211161
Is there any room for habeas corpus in the modern regime surrounding care orders? Only very exceptionally, the Supreme Court has ruled: Nicholas Dobson reports
  • In The Father v Worcestershire County Council [2025] UKSC 1, habeas corpus was not available to challenge a care order since the appropriate procedure would be either an appeal or an application to discharge the care order under s 39 of the Children Act 1989.

Habeas corpus ad subjiciendum (now simply habeas corpus—an order to produce the body (person)), is an ancient common law prerogative writ by which the sovereign exercises a right to inquire into why any of his subjects have been deprived of liberty. Although recorded by Blackstone in 1305, this appears to have been used before Magna Carta in 1215. Nowadays, habeas corpus is exercised by the High Court at the instance of an aggrieved applicant (see CPR 87). If the detention has no legal justification, release of the relevant party is ordered. As Lord Esher MR explained in Barnardo

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll