header-logo header-logo

04 October 2018
Issue: 7811 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

Green light for straight partnerships

Modern family types outside marriage for heterosexuals to be recognised

Civil partnerships will be opened up to heterosexual couples, Prime Minister Theresa May has announced.

Speaking to The Evening Standard this week while attending the Conservative Party Conference in Birmingham, May said samesex and opposite-sex couples would for the first time have ‘the same choices in life’.

More than three million couples in the UK live together but are not married, and about half of these have children.

Graham Coy, senior partner at Stowe Family Law’s London office, said: ‘This is a very welcome development and will provide protection to those who live together but do not want to marry.

‘What it will not do is give any protection to the increasing number of couples who do live together but do not want to marry nor enter in to a civil partnership. That anomaly still needs to be dealt with.’

Earlier this year, Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan (pictured), who wanted to have a civil partnership rather than a marriage but could not because they are a man and a woman, won a legal challenge at the Supreme Court, R (Steinfeld and Keidan) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. May’s announcement shows the government now intends to change the law in response.

Civil partnerships were introduced for same-sex couples through the Civil Partnership Act 2004 by Tony Blair’s government, giving them the opportunity to obtain the same rights and advantages as married couples. David Cameron, when in office, passed legislation that allowed same-sex couples to marry from March 2014. Civil partners can convert their relationship to marriage or retain their existing status. However, same-sex couples still can’t marry in Northern Ireland, and same-sex couples who are already married are recognised only as being in a civil partnership within its borders.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll