header-logo header-logo

30 April 2009
Issue: 7367 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail

Green light for Equality Bill

Expansion of discrimination law will extend positive action regime

Employment and human rights lawyers have largely welcomed Harriet Harman’s Equality Bill.

The wide-ranging Bill combines existing discrimination law into one statute, allows positive discrimination during recruitment, and bans gagging clauses on employees discussing their pay.

Employers with more than 250 staff members could be required to publish details of discrepancies between salaries from 2013.

Rachel Dineley, employment partner, Beachcroft LLP, says: “The Bill has been a long time coming and the sooner we distil the many pieces of legislation into a single Act, the better.”

Dineley says the expansion of the law on discrimination by association is a key development: “In future, workers who may themselves not have a relevant characteristic—related to gender, age or disability—but
are associated with someone who has, such as someone for whom they care or to whom they are related, may not be adversely treated, by reason
of that association. This will protect, for example, carers of the disabled or elderly parents.

“Controversially, the Bill will extend the positive action regime. Employers will be able to consider, when selecting between two equally qualified candidates, underrepresentation of disadvantaged groups and appoint the under-represented person. The merits of these new provisions are controversial and some view it as social engineering by the back door. However, with only 131 women on the UK FTSE 100 boards, one can see why the government perceives that positive action must be facilitated, where there is a driver to achieve a better balance in representation. Employers will have some discretion in how the power is exercised.”

Geoffrey Bindman, founder of Bindmans LLP, says the Bill completes the antidiscrimination reform process by bringing the substantive law into a single statutory code.

“The proposal to make the equal pay duty more effective by requiring disclosure of salaries and wages will not be welcomed by everyone,
especially the men who benefit from inequality,” he adds.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll