header-logo header-logo

Green light for Equality Bill

30 April 2009
Issue: 7367 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail

Expansion of discrimination law will extend positive action regime

Employment and human rights lawyers have largely welcomed Harriet Harman’s Equality Bill.

The wide-ranging Bill combines existing discrimination law into one statute, allows positive discrimination during recruitment, and bans gagging clauses on employees discussing their pay.

Employers with more than 250 staff members could be required to publish details of discrepancies between salaries from 2013.

Rachel Dineley, employment partner, Beachcroft LLP, says: “The Bill has been a long time coming and the sooner we distil the many pieces of legislation into a single Act, the better.”

Dineley says the expansion of the law on discrimination by association is a key development: “In future, workers who may themselves not have a relevant characteristic—related to gender, age or disability—but
are associated with someone who has, such as someone for whom they care or to whom they are related, may not be adversely treated, by reason
of that association. This will protect, for example, carers of the disabled or elderly parents.

“Controversially, the Bill will extend the positive action regime. Employers will be able to consider, when selecting between two equally qualified candidates, underrepresentation of disadvantaged groups and appoint the under-represented person. The merits of these new provisions are controversial and some view it as social engineering by the back door. However, with only 131 women on the UK FTSE 100 boards, one can see why the government perceives that positive action must be facilitated, where there is a driver to achieve a better balance in representation. Employers will have some discretion in how the power is exercised.”

Geoffrey Bindman, founder of Bindmans LLP, says the Bill completes the antidiscrimination reform process by bringing the substantive law into a single statutory code.

“The proposal to make the equal pay duty more effective by requiring disclosure of salaries and wages will not be welcomed by everyone,
especially the men who benefit from inequality,” he adds.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll