header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Government wrong to criminalise young people

News

Government plans to increase jail terms for young offenders after a  spate of teen shootings have been criticised by youth justice experts.

Home Office lawyers are currently looking into strengthening gun laws, and are working in conjunction with the London Mayor’s Office on how to tackle the issue. Prime Minister Tony Blair is due to host a gun crime summit this week. The Prime Minister told the BBC last week that the lower age limit for a mandatory five-year prison sentence for carrying a gun should be reduced from 21 to 17, and that being a member of a gang should be an aggravating factor in sentencing.

However, former Youth Justice Board (YJB) chair Rod Morgan, who resigned from his post last month, spoke out against increasing jail sentences for young people. Writing in The Guardian this week he says criminalising children and young people is “criminogenic”.

“Cluttering up courts with minor offenders deflects the system from devoting more attention to persistent, serious offenders whose risk of reoffending is high,” he says. “We should be spending more on early preventive work with children at risk and their parents. In recent years, the YJB has had no option but to spend seven times as much on custody as on early prevention schemes, the cost benefits of which are proven.”
 

Issue: 7261 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll