header-logo header-logo

24 May 2007
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Government must tackle impact of prison on families

Prisoners’ families face high rates of depression, poverty and housing disruption, with the estimated cost of imprisonment rising by almost a third when the social impact is taken into account, a new report finds.

Children in particular suffer hardship according to the research, carried out by the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (CCJS) and the Institute of Psychiatry at King’s College, London, and published by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

The report, Poverty and Disadvantage among Prisoners’ Families, calls on the government to take “immediate action” to protect the families of prisoners and to review its social welfare policy for them.

It finds high rates of depression and physical illness, increased vulnerability to poverty and debt and claims that expertise in the charity and statutory sector to address these disadvantages is “limited”.
About 4% of children experience the imprisonment of their father during their school years, according to government figures in its green paper Every Child Matters.

Dr Roger Grimshaw, director of research at CCJA, says: “Prospects for mental health, child development, and prisoner resettlement are all placed at risk by impoverishment of the most vulnerable. Unless there is a real change of policy direction, we have to be worried that the collateral damage of imprisonment will scar families for years to come.”

Issue: 7274 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll