header-logo header-logo

Gove scraps criminal courts charge

04 December 2015
Issue: 7680 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Widely criticised courts charge was "a bad experiment"

Criminal courts charges are to be scrapped on Christmas Eve the Lord Chancellor, Michael Gove, has said.

The news is an early Christmas present for criminal lawyers, who have mounted a vigorous campaign opposing the charges on the basis they encouraged innocent suspects to plead guilty to avoid paying them. The issue has even led to some magistrates resigning in protest at the unfairness of the charges.

Nigel Richardson, solicitor at Hodge Jones & Allen, says: “It was mandatory, magistrates and judges have had no choice whether to impose it and this has led to two results: potentially innocent defendants pleading guilty to avoid being hit by a charge they can’t afford; and the unedifying sight of those with absolutely nothing being hit with financial penalties they will never possibly be able to pay.

“Tens of millions will end up being written off and it will probably have cost far more to implement than it ever recovered. A bad experiment, properly scrapped.”

Welcoming the announcement, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, chairman-elect of the Bar, says: “The charge created a perverse incentive to plead guilty, negated the principle of judicial discretion, reduced compensation awards and was never likely to raise the funds anticipated.

“The Ministry of Justice has clearly listened very carefully to members from both Houses and from across all political parties, as well as to the legal profession, and others who have campaigned on this issue. We look forward to working with the Ministry of Justice as it reviews the alternative policy options."

The charges, which ranged from £150 to £1,200, were introduced a year ago by Chris Grayling, the former Lord Chancellor, to ensure “those who impose costs on the criminal justice system make a contribution to those costs wherever possible”. They were levied on criminal suspects, with higher charges for those who pleaded not guilty.

Malcolm Richardson, chairman of the Magistrates Association (MA), says: “This is fantastic news and we're very grateful to Mr Gove for listening to the case made by magistrates about the charge. In all my years on the bench, I've never seen something strike so hard at the heart of justice.

“Although we have lost many experienced magistrates, there will be an enormous sense of relief across the criminal justice system. We're grateful that Mr Gove made this announcement to the MA, as it stands in testimony to his collaborative approach and his appreciation of the work of magistrates.”

Michael Gove, who made the announcement at a meeting of the Magistrates’ Association Council, has also announced a review of the structure and purpose of fines and other penalties imposed by magistrates’ courts.

Issue: 7680 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll