header-logo header-logo

Google favoured in trademark dispute

25 September 2009
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Legal News , Media , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Google has received encouraging news in its long-running legal battle over whether its AdWords service infringes trademark rights.

Google has received encouraging news in its long-running legal battle over whether its AdWords service infringes trademark rights.

The AdWords service allows advertisers to purchase the right to have their advert displayed when certain keywords are typed into the Google search engine.

Louis Vuitton complained that adverts for counterfeit items popped up when internet users searched for the company, which infringed their trademark rights.

The resulting case was referred to the European Court of Justice.
Delivering his opinion in the joined cases of C-236/08, C-237/08 and C- 238/08, Advocate General Poiares Maduro said Google did not infringe anyone’s trademark rights by selling keywords corresponding to those trademarks.

An advocate general’s opinion is not legally binding on the court, but is usually followed.

Maduro said: “The question, as put to the court, is whether the use of a keyword which corresponds to a trade mark can, in itself, be regarded as a use of that trade mark which is subject to the consent of its proprietor.”

On whether an infringement had taken place, he said: “Trade mark proprietors have no legal problem in tackling counterfeit sites, as such sites are clearly involved in trade mark infringements; however, the practical difficulties of doing so should not be ignored.”

 

Issue: 7386 / Categories: Legal News , Media , Intellectual property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll