header-logo header-logo

24 November 2021
Issue: 7958 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Goodbye to SIF?

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has launched a consultation on its proposals to close the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) and end its post six year run off cover

SIF provided compulsory professional indemnity cover for solicitors from 1987 to 2000, when the profession switched to an open market model of insurance. It is a requirement that all policies include provision for at least six years run-off cover if the firm closes without a successor practice. About 90% of run-off claims are made within six years, and the most common type of claim faced by a solicitor is professional negligence, which has a six-year limitation period.

SIF, which has funds of about £22m, also provides run-off cover to firms once their six-year run-off period finishes, which is known as post six-year run-off cover (PSYROC). This provides continuity of protection for the client as well as peace of mind for retired solicitors.

The SRA predicts about 45 claims in 2023, lessening to 31 in 2029. It acknowledges the risk of delayed retirement where solicitors are concerned about long-tail claims and the increased risk of disorderly closure and ‘poor outcomes for consumers’, in annex 3 of the consultation.

However, Anna Bradley, Chair of the SRA Board, said: ‘Our analysis, in the light of detailed evidence, shows that establishing or maintaining a regulatory scheme to deliver ongoing post six-year run-off cover is unlikely to be proportionate in light of the level of consumer protection it provides.’

Calling for SIF to be retained, Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘The average successful claim is over £34,000, which is a large amount of money for most people.

‘The consumers who will suffer will employ solicitors on a reasonable assumption that they would have comprehensive protection if something went wrong. The SRA is suggesting that this comprehensive protection is removed, but it is yet to demonstrate that the removal of PSYROC will have any material impact on the cost of legal services or lead to any improvement in the market for legal services.’

The consultation ends on 15 February 2022, and can be viewed here.

Issue: 7958 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll