header-logo header-logo

16 January 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7636 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Going solo

A recent report illustrates the pressures facing the growing number of litigants in person, says Jon Robins

This is how one litigant in person, an electrician by trade, likened the daunting experience of coming before the family courts without a lawyer. “If I walked into a meter room, I could take the systems apart with my eyes closed. If you walked in there, you wouldn’t know what you were doing,” he explained in a conversation with a researcher in a new study published by the Ministry of Justice. Similarly, he walked into that courtroom and felt “absolutely blind”.

The report (Litigants in person in private family law cases) begins with the words of Lord Woolf, quoted in this column recently, which warned against the lawyers’ tendency to dismiss unrepresented litigants as “a problem for judges and for the court system rather than the person to whom the system of civil justice exists”. The “true problem” was the court system which was “often inaccessible”, the then Lord Chief Justice noted in 1995.

At

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll