header-logo header-logo

01 November 2013 / Mr Justice Foskett
Issue: 7582 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

The going rate

165800417

Foskett J sets the record straight over the survey into guideline hourly rates

A survey of law firms gets underway today (1 November) to help set new guideline hourly rates (or GHR) for solicitors, legal executives and other fee-earners. Here, Mr Justice Foskett, who chairs the committee responsible for that work, answers some pertinent questions.

 

Why do we need GHRs?

The guideline hourly rates were originally developed to help judges making summary assessments of costs in civil litigation and thus deciding what solicitors and other legal fee earners should be paid by the losing side for their work on a case. However, they have a wider influence than that and are a common reference point for practitioners, clients and the judiciary. They are set formally by the Master of the Rolls.

Why are new GHRs required?

They were last updated in 2010 and the underlying evidence for the 2010 rates was itself out-dated. Successive Masters of the Rolls did not want to increase the rates based simply on inflation. They have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll