header-logo header-logo

Going Dutch on product liability law?

10 May 2024 / Sarah Moore , Lily Parmar
Issue: 8070 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Damages , EU
printer mail-detail
171879
Sarah Moore & Lily Parmar look at the impact of a recent Dutch ruling for product liability lawyers in the UK
  • In February 2024, a court in Amsterdam certified the first ‘opt out’ product liability group action anywhere in Europe.
  • This landmark ruling marks the Netherlands out as truly progressive in a legal context. Could the UK Law Commissions follow the Netherlands lead?

The Netherlands has long been seen as a bastion of progressivism, social tolerance and good old-fashioned common sense. The landmark decision of a court in the Hague, against oil giant Shell, in May 2021, requiring it to cut its carbon emissions by 45% is the most high-profile recent example of this. However, it is perhaps a lesser-known procedural innovation in the Netherlands, the Dutch Act on Collective Damages Claims (WAMCA), introduced in January 2020, that holds the truly revolutionary potential to deliver the kind of mass access to justice that claimant lawyers in other countries, including the UK, can currently only dream about.

Happily,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll