header-logo header-logo

Getting tough on fraud

29 November 2007 / Karen Harrison , Nicholas Ryder
Issue: 7299 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Dr Karen Harrison and Dr Nicholas Ryder look at sentencing and the Fraud Act 2006

The law relating to fraud mainly comprises eight statutory deception offences in the Theft Acts (1968 to 1996) and the common law offence of conspiracy to defraud. The statutory offences are specific and overlapping, yet are not related to each other to cover the variety of fraudulent behaviour in an organised way. It is not always clear which offence should be charged, and defendants have successfully argued that the consequences of their particular deceptive behaviour did not fall within the definition of the offence with which they had been charged. See, for example, R v Preddy, R v Slade [1996] UKHL 13, [1996] 3 All ER 481.

In 1999, the Law Commission issued a consultation paper, Legislating the Criminal Code: Fraud and Deception, and published a final report in 2002 along with the Fraud Bill. The Fraud Act 2006 (FrA 2006) received Royal Assent on 8 November 2006. It overhauled and widened the array of criminal offences available

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll