header-logo header-logo

29 November 2007 / Karen Harrison , Nicholas Ryder
Issue: 7299 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Getting tough on fraud

Dr Karen Harrison and Dr Nicholas Ryder look at sentencing and the Fraud Act 2006

The law relating to fraud mainly comprises eight statutory deception offences in the Theft Acts (1968 to 1996) and the common law offence of conspiracy to defraud. The statutory offences are specific and overlapping, yet are not related to each other to cover the variety of fraudulent behaviour in an organised way. It is not always clear which offence should be charged, and defendants have successfully argued that the consequences of their particular deceptive behaviour did not fall within the definition of the offence with which they had been charged. See, for example, R v Preddy, R v Slade [1996] UKHL 13, [1996] 3 All ER 481.

In 1999, the Law Commission issued a consultation paper, Legislating the Criminal Code: Fraud and Deception, and published a final report in 2002 along with the Fraud Bill. The Fraud Act 2006 (FrA 2006) received Royal Assent on 8 November 2006. It overhauled and widened the array of criminal offences available

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll