header-logo header-logo

09 November 2022
Issue: 8002 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Future of retained EU law in doubt beyond 2023

The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill could have a devastating impact on legal certainty in the UK, lawyers have warned.

Under the Bill, currently at committee stage, all retained EU law would be repealed on 31 December 2023, unless incorporated into UK domestic law.

At stake are thousands of retained EU laws (direct EU legislation and UK secondary legislation) affecting employment, transport, data protection, agriculture, environmental and consumer protections, and more—retained under former prime minister Theresa May’s EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 following the UK’s departure from the EU. The retained laws include provisions on, for example, hazardous substances, building regulations, annual leave, equal pay, pregnancy rights, rest breaks and parental leave.

The Bill provides that the sunset date, currently the end of 2023, can be delayed until 23 June 2026 for specified pieces of legislation.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja (pictured) said the Bill ‘raises uncomfortable questions for parliamentary sovereignty, legal certainty, and the rule of law.

‘If the Bill passes in its present form, businesses cannot have any certainty about the legal and regulatory landscape beyond 2023. This would have a chilling effect on investment decisions, damage the UK’s standing as an international business hub and the global reputation of English law for certainty and predictability.

‘The Law Society therefore calls on the government to remove the arbitrary and unrealistic 2023 deadline in the sunset clause, to allow for a measured and thorough review of affected laws.’

The Bill also extends the Supreme Court’s power to depart from retained EU case law to other UK courts.

Shuja said this could result in different UK courts coming to ‘different, conflicting decisions’, and highlighted that ‘the legal test the Supreme Court uses to depart from its own rulings is necessarily high, uncodified and flexible. It reinforces legal clarity and certainty’.

According to Shoosmiths partner Charles Arrand and associate Hannah Howard, the Bill has the potential ‘to affect most, if not all, businesses in the UK’.

Michael Zander KC has written in NLJ this week on the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill—read his article here.

Issue: 8002 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll